Former Indian Economic Official Says Bitcoin Hard to Regulate, Should Just Ban Entirely

Mon, 03/12/2018 - 16:22
David Dinkins
Former secretary of economic affairs suggests simply banning Bitcoin instead of trying to figure out how to regulate it; is unclear how such a feat could be accomplished
Former Indian Economic Official Says Bitcoin Hard to Regulate, Should Just Ban Entirely
Cover image via U.Today

India’s former Secretary of Economic Affairs, Shaktikanta Das, says Bitcoin would be too difficult to regulate. Instead, to prevent the host of oft-mentioned potential problems such as terrorist financing and money laundering, Bitcoin should simply be banned, says Das. These comments come at a time when India is grappling with the challenges of regulating a decentralized, pseudonymous, virtual currency.


Bitcoin’s very nature resists regulation, which is driving regulators and government officials crazy. First, Bitcoin is pseudonymous, meaning that while not completely anonymous or impossible to trace, Bitcoin addresses are not tied to a person’s real-life identity. If one is extremely careful, it’s possible to transact anonymously using Bitcoin. Second, Bitcoin is a peer-to-peer digital currency, making it decentralized by definition. It’s impossible for authorities to censor or otherwise interfere with Bitcoin transactions due to the currency’s decentralized and trustless design.

When touching fiat

Regulators do have one ace up their sleeve. When the digital currency and fiat realms touch, that provides an opportunity for regulation. A person can do thousands of Bitcoin transactions per month, with anybody they want, and if he is careful, the government will never know. Nor will they be able to block or interfere with the transactions.

However, when it comes to buying or selling Bitcoin, the government has an opportunity to foist all sorts of regulations on its citizenry. While there are some non-AML/KYC trading options (such as, most people buy and sell cryptocurrency using exchanges, and any exchange that deals with fiat is required to follow AML/KYC laws. Likewise, tax authorities may be notified if your bank account receives an unusually large deposit or series of deposits. Even if they are not, in the event of an audit, your bank statements will give them plenty of opportunities to ask questions.

Go ahead and ban

Das suggests that due to the impossibility of regulating Bitcoin itself, and the difficulty of regulating Bitcoin-to-fiat interactions, India should just ban the currency outright. He said:

“Let us accept that it would not be possible to regulate it effectively. Because they will do transactions from their houses. You cannot enter every home to check what transactions are going on. So, I think this is a serious challenge, and this should not be allowed at all.”

Given that Das accepts that the government can’t simply enter everybody’s houses and check on their Bitcoin usage, it’s hard to see how regulators would manage to enforce a ban. While they can prevent Bitcoin from being bought and sold, as China has done, they certainly can’t keep people from using the Bitcoin network

About the author

David Dinkins is a freelance writer who holds a Master of Arts in history from Louisiana Tech University and has extensive teaching experience both at LSU – Shreveport and University of Phoenix. He got involved with cryptocurrency in early 2014 working as part of the Dash Core Team and have served in the role of writer/editor (mostly editor) during that time. He has edited a huge number of documents for the Core Team, including the Evolution whitepaper, the PrivateSend whitepaper, and many of Evan Duffield’s communications with the Dash Community.