Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.
In the SEC lawsuit, Judge Torres has ordered that Ripple pays $125 million in civil penalties, a fraction of the fines the SEC had sought, putting an end to the nearly four-year legal battle it fought with the U.S. regulator.
Judge Torres determined last July that XRP was subject to securities law only when offered to institutional investors. The SEC had sought nearly $2 billion in fines, but Ripple argued it should not have to pay more than $10 million.
Per the ruling issued, the Court does not presently hold that Ripple’s post-complaint sales have violated Section 5, hence a generic injunction was issued to stop any further violation of security laws.
Judge Torres also refused the SEC's request for Ripple to disgorge profits from sales. The regulator sought over $876 million in disgorgement, over $198 million in interest and a $876 million civil penalty.
The Judge stated that the case "does not involve allegations of fraud, misappropriation, or other more culpable conduct" and that the SEC had not proved that Ripple's failure to register the sales with the agency resulted in significant losses for investors.
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse highlighted the ruling as a victory for Ripple and the crypto industry as the court slashed the SEC’s demand by about 94%. XRP soared as much as 25% after the ruling.
XRP community reacts
Pro-XRP lawyer Jeremy Hogan took to X to celebrate the historic ending of the protracted Ripple SEC lawsuit, noting it as a "big win for Ripple."
Hogan shared a screenshot of a part of the ruling that touches on ODL sales, noting in a separate tweet that the judge did not give the SEC "the ODL language" it wanted.
Ripple argued a part of the proposed judgment, which enjoins it from "conducting an unregistered offering of institutional sales," should be altered to clarify that "it does not bar ODL sales, does not bar extraterritorial conduct and does not bar sales that qualify for exemptions from registration."
The court agreed "that the SEC's proposed language is too categorical and in any case, duplicative of behavior proscribed by part of the proposed judgement. The court will, therefore, omit the SEC's proposed part II."
Hogan believes that the injunction issued in the ruling does not change the status quo for ODL sales as the judge's denial of the SEC's language boosts Ripple's argument that there can be no expectation of profits when the XRP is only held for a second.