Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.
LUNC's parabolic growth in the beginning of September was fueled by the proposal to include a 1.2% burning fee on every transaction made on the network. Billions of dollars poured into the project as investors were looking for the exposure to the deflationary asset, but there is a catch.
The burning volume, according to the proposal, would exceed $4 million in a day if centralized exchanges accept the burning fee, and that is where potential problems for Luna appear.
/6 Even at face value, daily burn is much more likely to skew to the more conservative scenario, which models at $55k a day. A drop in the bucket for a $3b token that just went up 500% due to the excitement surrounding this proposal.
— light (@lightcrypto) September 11, 2022Bitcoin (BTC) Approaches $98,000 as Altcoins Lag BehindXRP 4 Days of Sleep: What's Next? Dogecoin (DOGE) Hints at Double Top Pattern Formation, Pepe (PEPE) Loses 21% in 6 Days, But There's Still ChanceBinance's CZ Warns About MacBook VulnerabilitiesMicroStrategy Raises Recent Convertible Notes Offer to $2.6 Billion to Buy More Bitcoin
One of the biggest exchanges in the world, Binance, has released a statement in which they told their users that they will not implement the fee, which puts the daily burning volume to only $55,000.
For a project with a $3 billion market capitalization, less than $100,000 of daily burning volume is insignificant and will not have any effect on the market value of the token.
As for now, the usage of the network is close to being free, and an additional fee on transactions will decrease the activity of users even more. The on-chain data contains some signs of manipulation from validators that have intentionally inflated the number of transactions on the network, as at some point the network's activity exceeded the total circulation of tokens.
Tomiwabold OlajideAll these factors show that the rally we saw previously was based on on-chain manipulation and a questionable proposal that will not have the desired effect on the market value of the token, considering the action that centralized exchanges are taking.
On Sept. 15, $34 million worth of LUNC tokens were released, which raises an important question: Who is going to buy all the volume injected on the market? The main increase in the trading volume we saw earlier originated from Binance due to relisting and lack of data that would show a previous catastrophic drop.
Alex Dovbnya
Vladislav Sopov
Dan Burgin
U.Today Editorial Team