Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.
Crypto lawyer Jesse Hynes believes that the Ripple-SEC lawsuit resolution might be closer than ever. Hynes recounts his take on the outcome of the lawsuit.
He makes the startling prediction that early XRP sales will be found to have broken securities laws.
As we get closer to the resolution of the Ripple case, I’m going to throw down my originally thoughts from years ago so people can tell me how unreasonably wrong I am when the case is decided. Let me know your thoughts:
— Jesse Hynes 🌱 (@jesse_hynes) May 22, 2023Stellar (XLM) Price Sensationally Jumps by 56% Overnight'Rich Dad Poor Dad' Author: 'I'm Following Saylor's Tactical Bitcoin Investment Plan'Elon Musk Slams SEC After Scoring Partial Victory in Court, DOGE Founder Joins HimEnormous XRP Breakthrough: $2 in Sight, Dogecoin (DOGE) at Pivotal Price Level, Ethereum (ETH) Forms Very Dangerous Pattern
Hynes continues by saying that this will establish a precedent that the SEC will use to go after many other crypto businesses on the grounds that if anything is sold for fundraising, an investment contract has been established.
The crypto lawyer thinks the court will nonetheless decide that Ripple is no longer violating securities laws with the way it is now conducting sales.
The biggest unanswered concern for him is whether the court will decide to address the question of whether XRP is a security in and of itself, as well as how to handle the early sales if they are deemed securities. However, he worries that the court may not rule on this.
He points out that the SEC has been pushing this issue hard with its recent assertions, so the court might feel pressure to rule in this way.
Hynes believes the only logical outcome would be that XRP itself cannot be an investment contract if the court makes a ruling about the status of XRP going forward.
Additionally, he believes that the fair notice defense will only be relevant if it is determined, strangely, that the asset XRP is an investment contract.
Ripple's claim that there was no fair notice of this is very strong. However, this truly only benefits Ripple, not users.
Hynes affirms that he simply does not see a court deciding that the asset XRP is a security.
Other takes on Ripple-SEC outcome
Matt Hamilton, former director of developer relations at Ripple, believes the outcome of the Ripple-SEC lawsuit might not be anticipated due to the complexity of U.S. regulatory and legal systems.
Gamza KhanzadaevHamilton noted that even if Ripple is in the right, the SEC may still be able to win the litigation.
The former Ripple director spoke as regards the recently discovered evidence by John Deaton, the founder of CryptoLaw, that SEC internal communications may show it is reasonable to assume that XRP does not satisfy all of the requirements of the Howey Test and may not be regarded as a security.
Vladislav Sopov
Dan Burgin