Ripple Case: Ex-SEC Official Stark Addresses SEC Appeal Denial
John Reed Stark, a former official of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), provided a detailed analysis of Judge Torres's recent decision in the Ripple case.
Many have interpreted the denial of the SEC's appeal request as a Ripple victory, but Stark points to potential challenges ahead.
More challenges
Stark stressed that there is a possibility of the regulator watchdog launching a successful appeal post-trial.
He praised attorney John Deaton and the XRP community for challenging the SEC's actions but maintained his belief that these defense strategies might not impact the final outcome.
He warned lawyers against citing Judge Torres's decision as precedent, suggesting that doing so might risk an ethical violation given that the judge has clearly stated her decision should not serve as a general precedent.
Earlier this week, the SEC's request for an interlocutory appeal was rejected by the court in a win for Ripple. However, as reported by U.Today, legal experts believe an appeal may still be possible after the trial concludes.
Alderoty's response
Stuart Alderoty, general counsel for Ripple, responded to Stark's comments, pointing out that XRP and Bitcoin might be the only digital assets with legal clarity.
In his reply, Stark acknowledged Alderoty's perspective and recognized the stakes for XRP holders. He once again stressed his belief that the decision could be overturned and shared articles explaining his stance on the SEC's crypto enforcement program.
The former SEC official also admitted admiration for the defense's tactics, citing his previous critiques of the SEC's practices.
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.