⭐ Features Masha Beetroot

EOS42 Head of Strategy David Packham: It Could Be Multiple Blockchain Models Thrive

⭐ Features
Blockchain is still in this discovery phase, says David Packham of EOS42
EOS42 Head of Strategy David Packham: It Could Be Multiple Blockchain Models Thrive

 

Hot sunny day in London, with its normal hustle and bustle, and I’m inside Henry’s cafe in Piccadilly. I have an interview with David Packham, Head of Strategy & Community EOS42, who’s been elusive for three days during my stay in UK. Now it’s arranged although the last moment he changed the venue.  Loud music and conversations around, glasses clinking- definitely the right place for talking about the global EOS community…

CryptoComes: What do you think of the future of EOS?

David Packham: I didn’t expect such a bumpy first month..I am happy we are where we are. I was not sure whether we would be in the top 21 for a long period of time so it’s very humbling and a huge relief for us. The team haven’t been paid in five months, I am about to get my first paycheck since January.

So yes, it’s humbling to be voted up in the top 10 right now, but it’s always challenging: with DPoS you never know where you will be. Regarding this I think these are the healthy times in the community debating in a decentralized manner- very, very complex things about the future of the network. And of course the beauty is if some people fundamentally disagree with the way the direction goes, say in governance, they can and will be able to just simply set another instance of EOS. It’s open source- so it’s not difficult to set another chain up in theory. Their big challenge will be getting the economic gravity of the community to move with them. It requires a fundamental split in creative energy. If you keep debating like we are, eventually the community should reach a form of consensus. The mainnet is always going to be king and now its established it will likely always be the most important EOSIO network of all, but there is going to be others for sure.

💼 Related Article
EOS’s Ricky Shi: Could Governments Hold EOS by the Balls? I Don’t Think So
🔥 Hot
7 months 1 week
256
EOS’s Ricky Shi: Could Governments Hold EOS by the Balls? I Don’t Think So

Decentralized, but how?

CryptoComes: Critics often say that EOS is not, in fact, a decentralized network, but subject to control by something akin to a government. They specifically mention the recent decision by the EOS centralized body to ban transactions from the specific 27 wallet addresses. What would you respond to the critics?

David Packham: There’s a few points on that. If the system is centralized, decision making will be quick, fast and efficient and you would see no external debate. We couldn’t be less like that! You see so much continual controversy, debate and people just prevaricating between the most inane details: that’s because we are decentralized. It took us a long time to even agree the frequency of the Block Producer meetings, because you’ve got a decentralized group trying to reach consensus. So I believe we are highly decentralized. If you look at Delegated Proof of Stake, it’s decentralized but making trade offs for performance. When you look at mining pools in both Proof of Stake and Proof of Work it is far more centralised in reality; Bitcoin has got six pools, the other governance structure is the unelected core devs, they effectively run the entire Bitcoin network in a meaningful sense. Therefore our interests as elected Block Producers is a lot better in line with the token holders.

CryptoComes: You think in delegated proof of stake they can change this consensus?

David Packham:Ultimately it is governed by understanding how the real world works, in which we delegate our power. You and I in a democracy delegate our power to representatives to run the government. So in this case in EOS, the token holders delegate their power to run the network to individuals, groups- the block producers. We have very strict controls on what we are allowed to do or not. That is all found in our constitution and our code of conduct.

That is why I disagree we at least have 21 individual groups at any one time running the network. Now there is some controversy about whether or not some of those groups may be controlled by multiple parties. They are being looked into actively by the community, and if they are they will try to shut them down. This is why it’s so important to have a really involved community that care. They are looking at this and I can see some evidence of voting that makes them suspicious and they are worried about it. The community are saying we are going to try and find proof and if so try and get these BP’s taken out of the top 21.

I genuinely don’t know if that is true or not but we are in the group listening to these discussions saying yes, we need to try and find out if that is true and act if so.

Right now we have got 21 different BP’s from all around the world and another 42 paid standbys- any one of which can switch in and out the moment you as a group of token holders decide this bad actor is taking bribes or underperforming.

For example if I am sitting here with Masha right now, and Masha is giving me an envelope of money to try and behave in a certain way and it gets found out. The community would say right, your reputation is destroyed and we as a Block Producer would be gone so fast- the penalty is enormous. So it’s a powerful system in that sense as our interests are highly aligned.

Regarding the 27 accounts, they are all direct byproducts of EOS 911. What happened is that those individuals raised a case with ECAF- the default interim arbitration service - they all submitted information onto the Ethereum account that EOS42 built, which proved they can move and control the Ethereum account where the tokens were, but could not control the underlying other account and each one of those 27 accounts had escaped mysteriously by somebody lets say a hacker, potentially, hasn’t been proven yet.

What ended up happening is that ECAF, being brand new and the network brand new, is that the block producers were put in a tough position as the only elected representatives in the entire network at present. ECAF has not yet been elected, the constitution has not yet been ratified and is interim. So following the spirit of that we collectively all reached 100 percent consensus between all the block producers and all the standbys on a two hour call, and said the right thing to do is for each of the accounts to be frozen to enable ECAF to investigate. Nothing more, no judgment just enablement of the constitution to function as intended.

It has been highly controversial! It led to a lot of thought about whether or not that’s really how things should work or not. And so the community is doing what it should and is having a massive debate. Dan Larimer the chief architect of EOS has strong views, other hugely influential community members are expressing different views. We will get there, we will work out what the right constitution is and we are going to have a referendum and then we will vote on that.

Certainly amongst those accounts in question, some of the admins of the EOS 911 channel are alleged account holders that have been defrauded. One account got missed by one BP and the money was moved immediately to exchange, so they lost 3,000 EOS as a result. It shows there is strong evidence relating to those accounts. These are individuals mostly from places like Korea who registered with a fake portal.

💼 Related Article
EOS Achieves 2822 Transactions Per Sec, Surpassing BTC, ETH, XRP
🔥 Hot
7 months 1 week
256
EOS Achieves 2822 Transactions Per Sec, Surpassing BTC, ETH, XRP

Governance

CryptoComes: How will you describe the EOS approach to governance, on a scale between a totalitarian state and complete anarchy?

David Packham: The best way, I think, to view EOS is it's more of a very large DAC. It’s a decentralized autonomous company in its own right. So when you put in place its governance structure, it is all hard wired, or it should be, into the code with Ricardian contracts which explain the interpretation of that into human language. So there is nothing that you and I can do, even if we were say part of the governance layer, to start making arbitrary decisions- everything needs to be constitutionally voted. Anybody can put forth an amendment to that constitution and if they get enough support for it have it voted on. So there is no sort of centralized control its decentralized governance but people look at the likes of ECAF, which looks very centralized. That actually reflects a lack of understanding of what arbitration is, and its limited role in the EOS governance and economic ecosystem.

CryptoComes: Btw this ECAF they are taking care of the same as you do at 911, for example like if there is a problem with the account, with the private keys, or they are officially the Block.one’s arbitration?

David Packham: They have nothing to do with Block.one technically. When Thomas Cox finished the draft constitution, and nominated an interim arbitration service to be created, called ECAF- that needs to be set up from scratch. Right now it doesn’t have any funding, the people working in it are working for free as volunteers and they are trying to get setup but it’s nothing to do directly with Block.one. Block.one actually deleted all the governance constitution documents in GitHub ahead of launch, it was left for those of us setting up the network to decide what we wanted to pull and restore. We ultimately as a group decided to implement the interim constitution, and decided it had been circulated widely throughout the community, debated, ratified, and agreed as best we could prior to a real referendum.

💼 Related Article
Dark DAO Threats Crypto Community: Research
🔥 Hot
7 months 1 week
256
Dark DAO Threats Crypto Community: Research

Block.one role

CryptoComes: What is the role of Block.one now? What happens if some producers will join forces to challenge the principles ingrained by Block.one into the system?

David Packham: In theory if ,all the block producers turned hostile to Block.one, said right we are going to freeze your account so you can never move money again. Block.one would simply set up a new EOS Blockchain. Why not? Literally any,body can set one up, and with their last commercial backing and the funds they have I am sure they would pull across the economic momentum of gravity and a lot of the community with them.

It’s a hypothetical question that’s not a serious proposition, in the sense that people would never do that. You also would be able to challenge them in the constitution. Block producers cannot arbitrarily freeze an account, the rule is as soon as the constitution were enacted it would need an ECAF order or another arbitration order to freeze an account. But actually the alternative constitution proposed by Dan Larimer is that this power should not sit at the base protocol level and that it would be above at the dApp layer.

So in that vision, each app could decide “we are going to use a different arbitrator for any dispute resolution on EOS and we are not going to use ECAF.” Any customer that signs up with you has to sign the terms which agree with that. What that would mean is there is no base layer going on at all, it’s all handled in yours. Your governance can be quite different from the governance rules of another app. That’s what Daniel Larimer wants and that’s his vision, which differs quite substantially from others. It’s an interesting one, the problem with it is much of the code and support mechanisms required to support that vision do not currently exist yet. So we would have no arbitration or protections for potentially years in the interim and be equivalent to say Ethereum. The community will decide what they want in that respect, and EOS42 will honor that decision and serve the network as a Block Producer.

CryptoComes: How big is the community you are working with? How will you describe it? What are your major principles in working with your community?

David Packham: The main thing I think is very simple with regards to community: if can never lose sight of the fact that as a block producer, you literally work for the token holders. The token holders are our collective boss to serve, if you lose sight of that then you will not last very long as a block producer. You will be out of the top 21 and will become a standby or unpaid even.

CryptoComes: How many user members do you have so far in the community? Individual wallets?

I don’t actually the estimated size oof hand I am afraid.

CryptoComes: How many are involved in the your Telegram group?

David Packham: The main EOS channel has got over 65,000 in it. For EOS42 it depends if you look at EOS London or our main BP one. EOS London blurs the line with us. We haven’t got a huge, huge group because we prefer to build up the community in real life, there’s enough Telegram groups already. You know some people have got 10,000 people but half of them aren’t real community members. Ours has got about 300 or 400 but that’s fine, thats a nice number and that means the community in that are the really active ones. If you think about our meetups, we get about three-400 at EOS London events, that means quite a few of them are engaged and actively on these groups too and its nice. I am not worried about numbers, there’s more to it than that!

Crypto theft

CryptoComes: According to recent research, theft in crypto industry is booming, with the volumes stolen this year times exceeding similar numbers in 2017. What are EOS tactics on dealing with this?

David Packham: On EOS every single account potentially compromised so far, has been purely down to the the registration process. It was down to the fact that we were doing a token swap, in effect, from Ethereum on to the mainnet. So the fraud occurred off chain, it occurred because of the registration process. So no lasting effects are known, I don’t think there any new ones occuring.

What’s happening other than that is that people are losing their private keys and having accidents but that was always going to happen. To a large extent that can be in theory resolved going forward, but before that we need to confirm whether or not ECAF will be the long term arbitration service or not - we need the referendum. Hence why many EOS block producers, including EOS42, are working together building a referendum contract and interface, and making it a priority.

CryptoComes: Do you think anything can be improved in the EOS voting system? Do you think it could be more fair?

David Packham: I don’t think it can be more fair than a referendum, where its one token per vote. I think it is a pretty powerful way of representing views. Some people are concerned about whales, concerned about individuals with what they would define to be too much power. But another way to look at it is those with the most tokens are the most invested in the long term success of the network. There are few who are going to care more about the success of EOS, than those with say 10 mln tokens- you care more about its success, not less.

It’s delegated proof of stake, but at the same time you are right it’s still the one who has the stake can vote than the one who doesn’t have them. That’s the minus of it.

The guy with 10 mln tokens, has so much more money than you and I have combined.  The counter argument is they have put in all that investment, they have so much on the line, it’s not fair for them to not have a bigger say. It is directly equivalent to shares in a company. Should the person who owns $10 mln dollars in Amazon only have the same say as you, who has put down $10,000?

If you look at what EOS token is for, it buys you a percentage of the bandwidth of the computational capacity of the network as well as the ability to vote. So in effect it gives you two things: it gives you a say in how the network is run and it gives you access to the power of the network directly linked to the amount you put in. So to me that is pretty powerful as a way of saying it is fair and right, but other people may disagree.

💼 Related Article
Best Cryptocurrency Trading Platform, How to Choose One
🔥 Hot
7 months 1 week
256
Best Cryptocurrency Trading Platform, How to Choose One

CryptoComes: When do you think EOS will dethrone Ethereum or it’s not on the current agenda?

David Packham: I think actually the individuals up at the top, like Vitalik and Dan Larimer, are way beyond simplistic things like EOS vs. Ethereum. I think they are true believers who are in it for the right reasons, that’s why for example Vitalik was in the EOS code base giving advice pointing out errors and things to think about right up to the EOS launch. You couldn’t see a better example of people cooperating and in it for the right reasons. They are way beyond money these guys, all of them.

I think it is fair to say they all want to see the benefits of decentralization. They are both trying different flavors of the same idea, which is they want to build a decentralized operating system and economy. No one is yet sure how best to do that. So you have to try a variety of ways, to really experiment and find out what works best. Until we try we will never know. That’s how most of the great experiments have led to discoveries. How many different chemical formulas did we try before the lightbulb. Blockchain is still in this discovery phase; we are trying different configurations and theories, and at some point we will get one that works extremely well and everyone will pursue that path. DPOS is the only scalable, proven model we have for public blockchains so far.

What we realize with Ethereum is some brilliant ideas and the concept, flaws with scalability, dispute resolution is non-existent, forking seems to be the only way they can handle and resolve. No protection comparable for current day bank accounts, if your money is stolen or you lose your private key you are left a hapless victim.

So these are problems that Ethereum is also trying to resolve by gradually upgrading the system.  In the meantime Dan Larimer’s own invention, DPOS, is taking this great idea and marrying the lessons from Bitshares and Steemit, the things that went right and wrong, to produce this third generation blockchain - EOS.

You know we may be talking again in five years time about a version 4 Blockchain project. Who knows, or it may be that EOS for example is so scalable and adaptable that unlike those before it can morph fully into a version 4 Blockchain and beyond as intended. It is designed to have every aspect of it re-coded on the move, which is something that Ethereum struggles with: you can’t do it that easily, you cannot change contracts once they are deployed. If you get one bug in them like the parity wallet hack where someone initialized the contract for the first time (as Parity forgot to do that in testing and deployment), the inadvertent hacker took ownership of the contract as the initializer of it, and then they selected to kill contract and it froze all the money in the parity wallet. Now in EOS you can actually fix that, you can go back and actually fix the problem. This is where you are getting more sophisticated models than before. It’s going to be really interesting seeing how it works.

But I do think going back to the original question these guys are not hostile to one another.

It could be multiple Blockchain models thrive and they are all part of a giant economy.

When I spoke at an EOS/Ethereum debate the core Ethereum developer and myself agreed on the same thing: we are all in this, it could very well be that EOS is London and Ethereum is NY, and they are two cities interacting economically together within the Blockchain community in the future.

💼 Related Article
Better than Bitcoin and Ethereum, But Something is Missing:Past-ICO Review
🔥 Hot
7 months
256
Better than Bitcoin and Ethereum, But Something is Missing:Past-ICO Review

In this Telegram channel you’ll find fresh news, interviews, infographics, forecasts & other helpful stuff. Join U.Today's channel.
⭐ Features
950 views views
👓 Recommended articles
something-wide
something-wide
⭐ Features Stavros Georgiadis

Tron Price Prediction 2019 – A Bottom at $0.0255 Has Formed. Will It Last in February?

⭐ Features
Tron (TRX) has a 1-year performance of about -34%, which is much better compared to the collapse of prices of other cryptocurrencies
Tron Price Prediction 2019 – A Bottom at $0.0255 Has Formed. Will It Last in February?

Tron Price Prediction 2019 – A Bottom at $0.0255 Has Formed. Will It Last in February?

Tron (TRX) has a 1-year performance of about -34%, which is much better compared to the collapse of prices of other cryptocurrencies. In fact, Tron has a year-to-date performance of +35.94%. In this article we will mention some Tron price prediction ranges from various sources, plus we will make our own Tron price prediction for February 2019 based on our technical analysis. Some key stats for Tron as of Feb. 2, 2019 are the following:

  • Price of Tron (TRX) is $0,026339
  • Market Cap: $1.755.963.777 USD, 503.847 BTC
  • Volume (24h): $200.614.221 USD, 57.563 BTC 
  • Circulating Supply: 66.666.917.581 TRX
  • Total Supply: 99.266.129.237 TRX
  • Rank 8 on CoinMarketCap based on top 100 cryptocurrencies by market capitalization

Tron price prediction February 2019 based on various sources

What are some Tron price prediction opinions?

  • WalletInvestor is pessimistic about the price of Tron in the long-term, but according to its forecast trend line the price of Tron may be above $0.030 in February 2019. It has a Tron price prediction for the next 14 days as $0.0331 USD to the upside and $0.0256 to the downside.
  • PrevisioniBitcoin is bullish on Tron, estimating that it will have a minimum price of $0.030 in February 2019.
  • CoinFan makes the following Tron price prediction range. A minimum price of $0.051126476 and a maximum price of $0.069171114. This seems to be a very optimistic price forecast as the minimum price is almost 96% above the current price of about $0.02633 as of February 2, 2019.
  • DigitalCoin only provides as a forecast the price of $0.03284536.
  • ExpressTricks has a Tron price prediction of $0.50 for February 2019, another very optimistic forecast.
  • CryptoGround is on the other side of forecasts, with a conservative Tron price prediction of $0.0270 for a time period of one month, a return of +1.79%.

Tron price prediction based on technical analysis

What does the weekly and daily chart for Tron tell us trying to make a forecast for February 2019? We will examine the two charts, trying to make an unbiased Tron price prediction for February 2019.

Tron price prediction based on weekly chart
Tron price prediction based on weekly chart
Tron price forecast based on daily chart
Tron price forecast based on daily chart

The two scenarios, the optimistic and the pessimistic ones, bullish and bearish for the price of Tron in February 2019 can provide some possible ranges.

Tron price February 2019 prediction bullish scenario

A very positive note is that both on the daily and weekly chart there is a trend shift from downward to upward. On the daily chart the price made a bottom around the level of $0.011, retested the low level of $0.012 and made a nice rally up to the level of $0.036 on January 10, 2019.

The price of $0.0257 as of Feb. 10, 2019 is above the 50-day and the 20-day exponential daily moving averages. The fact that both these moving averages are trending up is positive for the price of Tron. It means buying pressure. On the weekly chart the MACD indicator is trending up, and its histogram is positive, Momentum indicator is rising, and price is above the 50-period and 20-period exponential moving averages.

Switching back to the daily chart, the ADX/DMI indicator shows a strong trend and the +DI line is above the -DI line, with values of 25.41 and 20.20 respectively. A first target price is the upper daily Bollinger band at $0.029. Next potential targets would be the high prices of $0.0312 and the recent high price of $0.036.the 20-day exponential moving period with a value of $0.026, where current price of Tron is now, should provide a strong support.

Tron price prediction February 2019 bearish scenario

On the weekly chart the level of $0.0296 is a very strong resistance. Other strong levels od resistance are $0.0279, and $0.0288. On the daily chart the MACD indicator has made a bearish crossover, the Momentum indicator has lost its upward direction and now is pointing down, and there are strong levels of resistance at $0.0264, $0.027 and $0.0275. If the current uptrend is to pause and reverse, then possible targets are $0.0243, $0.0237 which coincides with the 50-day exponential moving average and then $0.022.

Traders should monitor the trendline that extends from the low price of $0.0127 on Jan.10, 2019 to the high price of $0.0263 as of Feb. 2, 2019. If this trendline does not hold as support, then lower prices are very likely.

For February 2019 we prefer the bullish scenario, as odds are for now in favor of it. As always it is not an investment recommendation, just an analysis and a forecast.

The fastest way to get crypto news is to follow our Twitter. You won’t miss a thing! Subscribe.
⭐ Features
3022 views views
👓 Recommended articles
something-wide
something-wide
⭐ Features Yuri Molchan

Is Tron Merely Another Pump and Dump Project? An Interview with Crypto Chico, ‘Truth Lover’ and ‘I-Dotter’ Regarding Crypto Projects

⭐ Features
Tyler Swope, also known as Crypto Chico, shares his personal vision of the Tron project on the particular case of the BTT ICO that happened on Binance the other day
Is Tron Merely Another Pump and Dump Project? An Interview with Crypto Chico, ‘Truth Lover’ and ‘I-Dotter’ Regarding Crypto Projects

On Wednesday, Jan. 30, Tyler Swope, nicknamed Crypto Chico, published a YouTube video claiming Tron and Binance plotted to grab some money by launching the BTT token on Binance Launchpad. U.Today prepared a news story, reporting this untypical point of view regarding Tron, Binance and their CEOs.

We have gotten in touch with Tyler Swope and asked him to clarify his position regarding Tron and their marketing strategy in particular.

‘I swear to tell truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth’

U.Today: Why are there so many crypto communities on Twitter who have a negative opinion about you?

Tyler S.: They have negative opinions on me cause I tell the truth of what goes on in crypto, and the truth hurts the most.

‘Tron is nothing but a pump and dump scheme’

U.Today: Tron has been making a lot of progress recently, having taken on several big games, including TronGoo (formerly EtherGoo) and MMORPG KuaiXiYou. It has managed to advance from beyond the top-ten list of crypto assets inside it pretty quickly, raising its market cap.

On dappradar.com many of the top ten dApps, those that show a great cash flow, are Tron-based, and none are powered by its rival Ethereum, for example.

Is Tron Merely Another Pump and Dump Project? An Interview with Crypto Chico, ‘Truth Lover’ and ‘I-Dotter’ Regarding Crypto Projects

Still, in the video about BitTorrent you poured some harsh criticism on Tron and Binance, along with their CEOs. What is the reason you are publicly criticizing those projects?

Tyler S.: Because it was an obvious pump and dump, marketing ploy and I would like the public to know this.

💼 Related Article
Ex-Tron (?) Employee: Justin Sun and Binance’s CZ Pumping TRX, BNB on Fake BTT ICO
🔥 Hot
3 weeks 3 days
256
Ex-Tron (?) Employee: Justin Sun and Binance’s CZ Pumping TRX, BNB on Fake BTT ICO

‘Justin Sun is no relative of mine’

U.Today: How are you connected with the Telegram channel ‘TRON (TRX) Announcements’, which posted a link to your video and claims that they know what indeed is happening with Tron?

Tyler S.: I have no connection to them and never heard of them before in my life before 30 January 2019.

‘Crypto market is irrational’

U.Today: What do you think the future of Tron is, in light of your video regarding the BTT ICO? Does it have any chance of reaching the list of the top-four coins in 2019, as Justin Sun promised?

Tyler S.: No, I don't believe it does, but who knows, this market is irrational.

‘Deceptive marketing tactics’

U.Today:  How can Tron be so popular with the community and dApp developers if you claim that Tron’s code contains a great number of bugs?

Tyler S.: They used deceptive marketing tactics and any good developer is not building on Tron. I used open source tools SonarCloud and SonarQube, you can check for yourself.

image

Join our Telegram channel to get news even faster!
⭐ Features
837 views views
👓 Recommended articles
something-wide
something-wide
⭐ Features Darryn Pollock

Bitcoin Obituaries Keep Rising But Why Is Bitcoin Still Not Dead?

⭐ Features
Bitcoin has been pronounced dead multiple times in its 10-year life; its recent fall brought about another obituary, but why is it that Bitcoin is NOT dead?
Bitcoin Obituaries Keep Rising But Why Is Bitcoin Still Not Dead?

A popular site called 99Bitcoins keeps a close eye on the number of times that Bitcoin has been declared dead in the mainstream media. Currently, it has accrued 336 obituaries for the digital currency.

The latest drop in the price of Bitcoin, which took it from the mid-$6,000 mark down to near on $3,000, sparked fresh panic and capitulation as many believed that the cryptocurrency had had its last days.

There were concerns over its utility and usefulness, as well as the potential for a so-called death spiral in the mining of Bitcoin as many miners shut up shop. Yet, Bitcoin continues to exist, and at time of writing, has bounced back to over $4,000.

So what is it that is keeping Bitcoin alive? It has no CEO, no company headquarters, and because of its decentralised nature, has no one to drive it to keep it alive; it relies solely on those who are interested in it.

The underlying blockchain

Bitcoin, or cryptocurrencies in general, have a very special relationship to their underlying technology, blockchain. They are of course dependent on each other to operate, but they also move independently of each other in many respects.

Blockchain is advancing in a very different path to that of Bitcoin, but it was Bitcoin’s initial explosion in the mainstream financial space that made people take blockchain seriously.

Now that the cryptocurrency bubble has essentially burst, there is a lot less hype and interest in it. However, blockchain, the technology behind it all, is getting a chance to come out and shine for its technological reasons alone.

💼 Related Article
The Blockchain Market Continues to Expand: Predictions for the Near Future
🔥 Hot
3 months 1 week
256
The Blockchain Market Continues to Expand: Predictions for the Near Future

For this reason, Bitcoin is still very much relevant. Blockchain progression is building steadily, and solidly, and because of its adoption across all centres, people still appreciate the usefulness of a digital token.

Bitcoin, as the major digital token that encapsulates all the main points of cryptocurrency and blockchain — such as decentralisation and transparency, and of course distribution — is the epitome of a functioning token economy.

Manageable mining

Another reason why Bitcoin hasn’t totally capitulated is because of its built in mining difficulty adjustment. Many people feared that Bitcoin could go under if the miners, an important part of any proof-of-work cryptocurrency, decided to abandon Bitcoin because of the increased difficulty and the loss of profitability.

Indeed, when the price dropped significantly in November, many miners did shut down and the hash rate also fell. But, because Bitcoin has a built in adjustment, the lower hash rate caused the mining difficulty to increase, and thus caused profitability to increase again, enticing miners back.

With more miners mining, there was increased health and activity on the blockchain, which leads to better interest and investment in the markets. This, in turn and in a compound way, then helps boost the price and drive more miners back in, again increasing profit and price.

Shedding the speculators

There is also a big difference between a burst speculative bubble and the death of a market. Some markets can be destroyed by the bubble pop, but in the case of Bitcoin, it is mirroring the dot com bubble because it has a similar nature.

With its underlying blockchain equitable to the internet, and the ICO hype and other factors equitable to Dot Com companies, one can see that this type of burst bubble is a chance for Bitcoin to shed its foolish speculative investors, and allow for those who are serious and successful to rebuild the market based on the important technology underneath.

Bitcoin will continue to be called dead, and erroneously so because it has only hit the mainstream in the last 18 months or so.

However, if one is to zoom out a bit, one would see that an investor who bought Bitcoin two years ago rather than, say, one year ago, would still be over 300 percent up on their investment.

Subscribe to the official U.Today Telegram channel. Get news first!
⭐ Features
689 views views
👓 Recommended articles
something-wide
something-wide
⭐ Features Guest Author

GameCredits Bittrex Review: The Detailed Guide for Beginners

⭐ Features
GameCredits (GAME) is an in-game payment platform that is poised to become a major disruptor in the multibillion-dollar gaming industry
GameCredits Bittrex Review: The Detailed Guide for Beginners

GAME (a.k.a. GameCredits) is an innovative cryptocurrency that has been very popular within the international gaming community. Thanks to the recent strategic partnerships with Microsoft and Xsolla, the team behind GAME crypto managed to achieve the incredible leap in promotion of this cryptocurrency.

Why should you exchange GameCredits on Bittrex?

There are so many exchange services out there. Why should you use the services of Bittrex in order to exchange or trade your GAME coins? The main advantage for beginners — Bittrex has never been hacked unlike other large platforms. Since 2017 all user accounts of this U.S. exchange service are solidly protected.

Also, this project implements the multi-level wallets strategy. About 90% of customer funds are stored offline. 2-factor authorization is offered for users (in particular, for withdrawal of their funds from wallets). If it is not activated, the exchange sets certain limits on withdrawals.

Features of Bittrex for GAME users

Bittrex offers a modern trading platform that is always accessible offline. If you type GAME in the search field on the main page, you will instantly see the chart with prices changing in real time. For example, currently (5th December 2018) you may see that the price of 1 GAME in the pair USD/GAME on Bittrex is $0.07.

Below the chart is a window with platform’s apps. The platform is designed for both beginners and experienced traders. You may check the possibility of a thorough technical analysis of any assets using technical indicators is implemented.

By default, an algorithm for calculating volumes is set straight on the chart of GAME/USD and GAME/BTC. The site features 450 currency pairs traded with Bitcoin. There are quite good trading opportunities with both BTC and ETH for GAME owners.

However, Bittrex does not have currency pairs with fiat money. Buying Bitcoin, Ethereum or Tether is possible by bank transfer. In order to use this service, you must pass the account verification. Traders have the opportunity to open different types of orders.

For example, they can buy GAME and other available assets at the market price or choose pending orders for the purchase of a particular cryptocurrency at the desired value. The only drawback - Bittrex does not offer any margin trading.

Deposit and withdrawal of GAME funds of the Bittrex exchange provides wide opportunities for those who want to replenish their account and withdraw money from it with GAME cryptocurrency. Two stages of verification actually mean that the base level is the inclusion of 2FA and filling in the "About me" fields. To withdraw more money (more than 4 BTC), full verification is required.

Currently, there are two types of accounts on Bittrex:

  • Basic. Users provide name, address of residence, indicate the date of birth. This data is verified through open sources (social networks, for example). However, if security officers of the company fail to verify the information, more detailed verification will already be required with the participation of the user;

  • Advanced. To open such accounts, the user must provide scanned copies of identification documents along with a selfie attached;

How to buy and sell GAME on Bittrex?

According to almost any user’s review of GameCredits on Bittrex, the website offers the opportunity to trade market and limit orders. The first allows you to buy a cryptocurrency at the current price at which it is offered on the market.

Let’s suppose, GAME coin is worth $1. A user wants to buy it and is ready to pay that price. In this case, he chooses a market order, enters the volume of the transaction and presses the “Buy” button. If the user already has bitcoins and he wants to sell them, at the same time, the current price on the market fully suits him, this can also be done by placing a market order, only for sale.

Fees for services here are considered average for the global market. Bittrex charges 0.25% commission for all transactions. At the same time, payments from traders can be reduced depending on the time of the user’s trading status.

Join our Telegram channel to get news even faster!
⭐ Features
215 views views
👓 Recommended articles
something-wide
something-wide
⭐ Features Joseph Young

Gov’t of India Reportedly Plans to Regulate Crypto, What’s the Motive?

⭐ Features
The government of India is exploring the possibility of legalizing crypto and regulating exchanges
Gov’t of India Reportedly Plans to Regulate Crypto, What’s the Motive?

Several local publications have reported that the government of India is exploring the possibility of regulating crypto.

At an official government meeting hosted by the interdisciplinary committee, a task force led by members of the Ministry of Economics and information Technology and the Ministry of Home Affairs, the committee ruled in favor of regulating cryptocurrencies with strict policies.

Sudden Change in Stance Toward Crypto

In April, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) imposed a blanket ban on cryptocurrency trading, prohibiting the country’s financial institutions from dealing with cryptocurrency-related businesses.

The unexpected ban on cryptocurrency exchanges implemented by the country’s central bank effectively disallowed trading platforms from obtaining banking services from local financial institutions.

Several exchanges tried to pivot to cryptocurrency-to-cryptocurrency trading but with the dominance of Binance, OKEx, Huobi, and other crypto-only exchanges, local digital asset trading platforms failed to compete and shut down their businesses.

At the time, the RBI threatened to end its relationship with any local bank that deals with digital asset exchanges. A circular released by the central bank read:

“In view of the associated risks, it has been decided that, with immediate effect, entities regulated by RBI shall not deal with or provide services to any individual or business entities dealing with or settling VCs (virtual currencies). Regulated entities which already provide such services shall exit the relationship within a specified time.”

In July, industry leaders, associations, and companies challenged the controversial decision of the RBI by filing a complaint with the Supreme Court of India. Within several months after the filing, the court ruled in favor of the RBI, allowing the central bank to impose a ban on cryptocurrency trading.

💼 Related Article
Merry Christmas from Ripple and Binance: XRP as Quote Currency
🔥 Hot
2 months
256
Merry Christmas from Ripple and Binance: XRP as Quote Currency

However, on December 26, a senior government official told The New Indian Express in an interview that the government believes cryptocurrencies cannot be dismissed as illegal currencies and the asset class has to be regulated with strict policies.

“We have already had two meetings. There is a general consensus that cryptocurrency cannot be dismissed as completely illegal. It needs to be legalised with strong riders. Deliberations are on. We will have more clarity soon,” the official said.

The change in the stance toward cryptocurrencies from the government of India likely comes from its acknowledgement of the risk in unregulated cryptocurrency trading. By placing a ban on digital asset exchanges, it forced investors out of a self-regulated market to unregulated peer-to-peer and over-the-counter markets that are difficult to regulate and monitor.

If the intent of the government is to prevent money laundering through the usage of cryptocurrencies, a more effective way of doing so is to allow cryptocurrency trading on exchanges with strict Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) systems in place.

When Could It Take Place?

Many reports were released in the past anticipating the legalization of cryptocurrencies by the government of India. Yet, the government showed no signs of regulating the asset class in the past 12 months.

With the G20 agreeing to regulate cryptocurrencies to crack down on money laundering, India, which is a part of the G20, could follow the global trend of regulating the asset class.

Given the history of India in the cryptocurrency sector, it may take several months to potentially years before cryptocurrency trading is revitalized and completely legalized with stable banking services provided by local financial institutions.

Only the most important posts per day. Infographics, analytics, reviews & summaries. Follow us on Facebook!
⭐ Features
258 views views
👓 Recommended articles
something-wide
something-wide