Half of 2017’s ICOs Have Already Failed, Most Within Months of Initial Fundraising

Mon, 02/26/2018 - 05:50
David Dinkins
The numbers are in for 2017’s ICOs, and they don’t look particularly encouraging.
Cover image via U.Today

Roughly half of all ICOs in 2017 have failed, according to Fortune. The number gets even higher- 59 percent- when you include projects that “semi-failed,” where the founders essentially went off the radar or the community lost interest and died. All told, investors lost $233 mln on failed ICOs last year. While these numbers seem dismal, ICO proponents would point out that three quarters of all traditional startups fail.

ICO craze

The ICO craze began in early 2017, around April, when the price of Bitcoin and other digital currencies really began to soar. Blockchain-related projects have been using Initial Coin Offerings since Mastercoin offered their tokens for sale in 2013. Ethereum is the most famous early ICO, as the project’s founders raised $18 mln to pay for the creation of the software.

A number of large ICOs put the fundraising method on the map, with the largest ICO, that of Filecoin, raising over $250 mln. Tezos raised $232 mln and EOS netted $185 mln. Such massive raises brought the total amount of ICO funding last year to an astonishing $5.6 bln. By contrast, traditional venture capital provided only $1 bln in funding for Blockchain startups.

Numbers possibly skewed

Considering that three-quarters of all traditional startups fail, ICOs don’t sound so bad with their nearly 50 percent failure rate. But the problem is timing. Since the ICO mania really began soaring only in the last four months of the year, these numbers are severely skewed. When you consider that most ICO failures have happened within only a few months, it paints a pretty grim picture of the failure rate.

Likewise, the average ICO, including failures, returned 1,280 percent of an investor’s initial capital. However, much of that ROI comes from ICOs that happened earlier in the year. For an ICO investor who didn’t get involved until the second half of the year, things undoubtedly look much worse.

With regulatory clouds gathering and so many ICO-funded startups failing a few months after their ICO, investors need to be wary and exercise due diligence. The ICO market is starting to look a lot like the dot-com market in the late 1990s, and for every Amazon.com that survives and thrives, there will be dozens of companies like Pets.com that don’t.

Subscribe to U.Today on Twitter and get involved in all top daily crypto news, stories and price predictions!

About the author

David Dinkins is a freelance writer who holds a Master of Arts in history from Louisiana Tech University and has extensive teaching experience both at LSU – Shreveport and University of Phoenix. He got involved with cryptocurrency in early 2014 working as part of the Dash Core Team and have served in the role of writer/editor (mostly editor) during that time. He has edited a huge number of documents for the Core Team, including the Evolution whitepaper, the PrivateSend whitepaper, and many of Evan Duffield’s communications with the Dash Community.

This site uses cookies for different purposes. Please set your preferences in Cookie Settings and visit our Cookie policy for more information on how and why cookies are used on this site. Click here for cookie policy