Advertisement
AD

Main navigation

Advertisement
AD

Bitcoin Core Developer Luke Dashjr Worried About This New Update

Advertisement
Fri, 2/08/2024 - 8:38
A
A
A
Bitcoin Core Developer Luke Dashjr Worried About This New Update
Cover image via U.Today
Read U.TODAY on
Google News

Bitcoin Core developer Luke Dashjr voiced concerns regarding the current situation in the Bitcoin community, drawing comparisons to what happened seven years prior, when the Segwit update was implemented

Advertisement

According to Dashjr's comments, there is a growing discussion in the community regarding the necessity of increasing the number of active users and updating spam filters. Segwit, a significant protocol update intended to increase transaction efficiency and lower fees, was activated by the Bitcoin community seven years ago. The developers of Bitcoin Core initially opposed this decision, arguing that miners should be the only ones to make such decisions. Nevertheless, this decision was made. 

Article image
BTC/USDT Chart by TradingView

The launch of Segwit marked a significant milestone in the history of Bitcoin and showed the strength of the community in pushing protocol upgrades. Dashjr observed a similar scenario involving the planned modifications to the Bitcoin spam filter currently taking place. He recently tweeted his displeasure with the community's lack of activity, claiming that many people have become too passive or are dissatisfied with the activities.

Related
 

Advertisement

He emphasized that unlike fiat currencies, which are centralized, Bitcoin should not be dependent on a centralized service team. Instead, it should be decentralized at its core. Dashjr's appeal for action emphasizes how crucial engaged users are to the Bitcoin community. 

Users should make their own decisions and not merely rely on the central government, according to Dashjr, in order to maintain the true principles of Bitcoin's decentralization. This viewpoint is consistent with the underlying philosophy of Bitcoin, which was developed as a decentralized financial system substitute. 

In the community, there is debate about whether or not to update spam filters. Some contend that in order to preserve network performance and lower the quantity of pointless transactions, stronger spam filters are required. Some worry that censorship could result from these actions, undermining the fundamental principle of Bitcoin: unrestricted transparent transactions.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.

A
A
A

Related articles

Advertisement
TopCryptoNewsinYourMailboxSubscribe
TopCryptoNewsinYourMailboxSubscribe
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to daily newsletter

Recommended articles

Latest Press Releases

Our social media
There's a lot to see there, too

Popular articles

Advertisement
AD