Main navigation

CryptoLaw Founder John Deaton Makes Bold Predictions on Ripple SEC Lawsuit: Details

Wed, 02/23/2022 - 14:50
article image
Tomiwabold Olajide
CryptoLaw creator John Deaton makes wild predictions about Ripple's XRP lawsuit: details
CryptoLaw Founder John Deaton Makes Bold Predictions on Ripple SEC Lawsuit: Details
Cover image via

Disclaimer: The opinion expressed here is not investment advice – it is provided for informational purposes only. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of U.Today. Every investment and all trading involves risk, so you should always perform your own research prior to making decisions. We do not recommend investing money you cannot afford to lose.

Read U.TODAY on
Google News

CryptoLaw founder John Deaton seems to be making bold predictions on the ongoing Ripple-SEC lawsuit. He sees the lawsuit coming to a favorable conclusion for XRP as the SEC may have to prove that Ripple's defendants, Chris Larsen and Brad Garlinghouse, had actual knowledge that XRP was a security, or that they were reckless in not knowing. The CryptoLaw founder believes the task of determining this might be an impossible burden for the SEC.

Reviewing some of the pieces of evidence presented, Deaton says, ''To prove recklessness, the SEC must prove a reasonable person would've known XRP was a security because it was so clear and obvious to anyone at that time.''

A trail of reactions followed the unsealing of the two 2012 Perkins Coie legal memos over the weekend.

Defense lawyer James K. Filan expressed his views, saying, ''There was certainly nothing in these memos that suggests that Ripple was being reckless or ignored any substantial risks.'' Filan feels that the unsealing of the memos is, overall, favorable to Ripple and to the individual defendants.

Stuart Alderoty, Ripple's general counsel, puts forward his conclusion on the documents, saying, ''The conclusion of these now-public 2012 memos is clear: XRP 'do not constitute securities.' "

In recent updates in the case, Ripple's lawyers argue that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) should not be allowed to bolster its case against the company's pivotal fair notice defense by filling the gap with "out-of-circuit" cases.

In its request to file a sur-sur-reply to Ripple's sur-reply, the SEC points to a similar case involving blockchain company LBRY Inc. Ripple, however, mentions that the SEC did not even ask to strike the defense in the LBRY case, claiming that such an omission is "remarkable."

article image
About the author

Tomiwabold is a cryptocurrency analyst and an experienced technical analyst. He pays close attention to cryptocurrency research, conducting comprehensive price analysis and exchanging predictions of estimated market trends. Tomiwabold earned his degree at the University of Lagos.