Main navigation

MakerDAO Co-Founder: MIM and UST are "Solid" Ponzi Schemes

Tue, 01/04/2022 - 16:54
article image
Arman Shirinyan
MIM and UST get roasted by MakerDAO creator
MakerDAO Co-Founder: MIM and UST are "Solid" Ponzi Schemes
Cover image via

Disclaimer: The opinion expressed here is not investment advice – it is provided for informational purposes only. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of U.Today. Every investment and all trading involves risk, so you should always perform your own research prior to making decisions. We do not recommend investing money you cannot afford to lose.

Read U.TODAY on
Google News

The co-founder of MakerDAO, Rune Christensen, has called Terra's UST and MIM solid Ponzi schemes that will turn into nothing as market conditions change.

The developer noted that the two digital assets are not built for "resilience" and are going to become victims of abnormal volatility and drop to zero. Christensen has also asked to stop scam users that are being used as "exit liquidity."

He later added that he respects both projects for being solid Ponzi schemes and said that it is indeed possible to earn some profit off both projects.

Later on, Christensen posted another tweet to clarify his previous posts. The developer has said that he has nothing against Ponzi schemes or high-risk assets. He noted that everyone has a right to have "fun the way they want."

What are MIM and UST?

MIM, or Magic Internet Money, is a decentralized finance protocol that allows users to earn interest via depositing "Interest-Bearing Assets," as the project's website suggests. In a nutshell, the project providers users with well-known DeFi solutions that are being widely used in the industry.

Trial E-CNY Wallets for iOS and Android Launched by China’s Central Bank: Reuters

The second coin that attracted MakerDAO's developer is Terra's UST stablecoin, which is part of a larger Terra blockchain protocol that utilizes algorithmic decentralized stablecoins. UST is a U.S. dollar-pegged asset that is also used for interest rate farming and borrowing.

Both assets have common features, and Christensen's critique is aimed at the DeFi industry in general and numerous projects that are being pushed on communities for the stable and "passive" income it offers.

article image
About the author

Arman Shirinyan is a trader, crypto enthusiast and SMM expert with more than four years of experience.

Arman strongly believes that cryptocurrencies and the blockchain will be of constant use in the future. Currently, he focuses on news, articles with deep analysis of crypto projects and technical analysis of cryptocurrency trading pairs.