Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by our writers are their own and do not represent the views of U.Today. The financial and market information provided on U.Today is intended for informational purposes only. U.Today is not liable for any financial losses incurred while trading cryptocurrencies. Conduct your own research by contacting financial experts before making any investment decisions. We believe that all content is accurate as of the date of publication, but certain offers mentioned may no longer be available.
As the ongoing legal brawl between blockchain payments firm Ripple Labs Inc and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) draws to a close, questions surrounding a settlement between the two is now taking center stage in the discourse. In a recent tweet, popular crypto advocate and attorney John Deaton shared a key condition that may aid a swift settlement between both parties, should the option arise.
Taking to his favorite platform, Twitter, Deaton said he is confident that the company's lawyer will advise a settlement if the SEC agreed in writing that the ongoing and future sales of XRP are not securities. In his words:
If the SEC agreed in writing ongoing and future sales of #XRP by @Ripple are NOT sales of securities AND also agreed that secondary market sales of #XRP by any person or entity (ie exchanges) will NOT be sales of securities, I’m confident 10/10 lawyers advise settlement.
Yuri MolchanThis comment was made in response to a question from a Twitter user seeking to get the lawyer's opinion on whether Ripple will agree to a settlement on demand that the Hinman Email is kept private.
I'd like to ask @JohnEDeaton1 & @attorneyjeremy1 a question regarding the SEC vs Ripple case. From an "impartial" view; if the SEC offered a settlement (pay a fine, future XRP sales are not securities, & no release of Hinman emails), how would you advise Ripple?
— Mass Adoption (@mass_adoption) February 22, 2023
Will SEC give up its core argument?
Hitting a settlement might present a win-win scenario for both the SEC and Ripple, however, the cost might be negatively skewed on the part of the regulator. The core argument of the Gary Gensler-led commission is that the sale of XRP was an unregistered security, and declaring in writing that this is not so might reduce the regulator’s credibility in the broader financial ecosystem.
The SEC has a number of likely lawsuits it is possibly eyeing, including those involving Kraken and Paxos Trust. The precedent that will be set with that of Ripple will be very vital in future enforcement actions and will make the regulator think twice before arriving at a settlement.
Tomiwabold Olajide
Yuri Molchan
U.Today Editorial Team
Vladislav Sopov
Dan Burgin