Advertisement
AD

Ripple's CTO Emeritus Shuts Down 'Nonsensical' Centralization Accusations

Wed, 25/02/2026 - 5:36
Ripple CTO David Schwartz has dismissed claims of XRP Ledger centralization as "objectively nonsensical.".
Advertisement
Ripple's CTO Emeritus Shuts Down 'Nonsensical' Centralization Accusations
Cover image via U.Today
Add as a preferred source on
Google News

David Schwartz, Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer (CTO) and one of the original architects of the XRP Ledger (XRPL), has taken to the X social media network to shut down speculation regarding the network's perceived centralization. 

Advertisement

"Objectively nonsensical"

As reported by U.Today, Justin Bons, founder of Cyber Capital, posted a scathing thread on X (formerly Twitter), urging the crypto community to "reject all centralized 'blockchains'." He has specifically named Ripple, Stellar, Hedera, and Algorand. 

Bons argued that Ripple’s Unique Node List (UNL) makes it possible for the Ripple Foundation to gain "absolute power" and "control" over the chain.

HOT Stories
Ripple's CTO Emeritus Shuts Down 'Nonsensical' Centralization Accusations Crypto Market Review: Shiba Inu Is Completely Baseless, XRP's Stabilization Price Level Nears $1.20, Bitcoin Dives Below $62,720

Schwartz was quick to shut down this argument, stating that it was "objectively nonsensical."

Advertisement

The former Ripple CTO drew a sharp parallel to Bitcoin mining to illustrate the absurdity of the accusation.

You Might Also Like
Advertisement

"This is as objectively nonsensical as claiming someone with a majority of mining power can create a billion bitcoins," Schwartz wrote.

Schwartz has also rejected the idea that it would be possible to double-spend or censor transactions. 

"You count the number of validators that agree with your node, and your node will not agree to double-spend or censor unless you, for some reason, want it to," he said.

Even if validators tried to act maliciously, the network’s design protects honest participants.

He conceded that a conspiracy of validators could theoretically "halt the chain from the point of view of honest nodes." This is the XRPL equivalent of a dishonest majority attack, but they never get to double-spend.

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Subscribe to daily newsletter

Recommended articles

Our social media
There's a lot to see there, too